Residents of C.V. Raman Nagar in Bengaluru submitted a memorandum to their MLA, S. Raghu, on Saturday, urging him to oppose the elevated corridors project undertaken by Bengaluru Smart Infrastructure Ltd. (B-SMILE). The memorandum, which outlined concerns over the project's potential impact on the neighborhood, was delivered to Mr. Raghu’s office by a delegation representing the community. The residents are part of a broader citizen campaign advocating for the cancellation of the project and the redirection of its estimated ₹13,000-crore budget toward scientifically-backed mobility solutions.

The campaign, which has been active for about two weeks, previously hosted a citizen discussion titled 'Dear DK, Flyover Yaake?' to raise awareness about the project's implications. The group has also contacted Shanthinagar MLA N.A. Haris from the Congress party, sharing a copy of the memorandum. They plan to approach other legislators whose constituencies lie along the proposed corridor routes as part of their campaign against the project.

The elevated corridors project, which has already received tender awards, has drawn criticism for its potential disruption to local neighborhoods and its high cost. Campaigners argue that the funds could be better allocated to alternative transportation solutions that address urban mobility more effectively. However, no official response from the government or B-SMILE has been provided to date. The memorandum submitted to Mr. Raghu remains the primary evidence of the residents' concerns.

The campaign's efforts highlight growing public dissent over large-scale infrastructure projects in Bengaluru, where urban development often faces resistance due to environmental and social concerns. The residents’ call for intervention underscores the role of local representatives in mediating between civic interests and government initiatives.

The project's scale and cost raise questions about its feasibility and long-term benefits. While proponents may argue that elevated corridors can alleviate traffic congestion, critics emphasize the need for sustainable and inclusive urban planning. The lack of a formal response from the authorities means the debate remains unresolved, with the outcome dependent on further public discourse and political action.

What remains unknown is the extent of public support for the project, the specific mobility solutions the campaigners propose, and the potential impact of the project on the city's infrastructure and environment. The absence of a formal response from the government or B-SMILE leaves the situation in limbo, with the residents' memorandum serving as a key point of contention in the ongoing debate over Bengaluru's urban development.